Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a general score of 90.7 against 74.4. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra construction is newer, but a little bit thicker and much heavier than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much better screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, much more brightness and a bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra captures a little bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a way higher video quality and a back facing camera with a better resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.