Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has an overall score of 81.4, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is older than OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's construction is lighter and a little bit thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it provides a lot of extra features.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, and they both have the same display brightness, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with as much storage for apps and games as the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, they have equal internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a camera that is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in poorly lited environments, they both have a 48 MP camera in the back, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.