Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, with a score of 79.2 against 74.4. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi A3 has newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10. Even though Xiaomi Mi A3 is older and just a little thicker than OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's construction is still just a little lighter.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a higher display pixels density and a little bit larger display. The Xiaomi Mi A3 features a very superior storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a 48 megapixels camera and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments and a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Mi A3's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Find X2 Lite, although the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has 4030mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.