Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a global score of 78.2 against 74.4. These phones include the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco M3 is a just a little heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a same size sensor and a same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a way better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.