Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a score of 76.6, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 general score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is an a little heavier and thicker phone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should give very similar OS features.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little greater pixel number per inch of display. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Lite takes a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a much better (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with improved battery life than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.