Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a global score of 81.1 against 74.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is heavier and thicker than OPPO Find X2 Lite. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a quite greater display pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a much more MP back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with superior battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.