Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with an 87.1 score against 77.7. The iPhone 8 Plus construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but it's somewhat heavier. IPhone 8 Plus counts with a bit superior CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit more vivid screen than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, more screen brightness and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The OPPO Find X2 Neo and the Apple iPhone 8 Plus both feature incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots better pictures and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.