Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a global score of 84.2 against 77.7. IPhone XS is a just a bit heavier device than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but they are 0.3inches thick. Apple iPhone XS has a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS features a little bit better screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller display and way less brightness, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density and a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a much more megapixels back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.