Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's score of 77.7. Google Pixel 3 is an older and a bit thicker phone than OPPO Find X2 Neo, but Google was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photos, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.