Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a overall score of 78.8 against 77.7. Although the Google Pixel 3a is older and just a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's body is still lighter. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo captures better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way more mega-pixels back camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.