Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's overall score of 77.7. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel 3a XL is older and a little thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's body is still a little bit lighter. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little larger display and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture and a lot more MP camera.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 9% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.