Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Neo is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra, with a general score of 77.7 against 77. OPPO Find X2 Neo's construction is extremely newer and a little bit thinner than the HTC U Ultra's, although it is just a bit heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of faster cores and more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a bit better screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger screen. HTC U Ultra has a greater storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.