Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Neo is just a bit better than HTC U11, getting a global score of 77.7 against 77.6. Although the OPPO Find X2 Neo is a bit heavier than HTC U11, it's just a little thinner and also extremely newer. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more vivid display than HTC U11, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display and a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better performance than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much better camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a camera in the back with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.