Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's general score of 77.7. Even being the best we are comparing, the LG G8S ThinQ construction is older, just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8S ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a slightly better display than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a just a little more pixels per screen inch, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger display. The LG G8S ThinQ features a very superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much clearer photos and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little better battery performance than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.