Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, having an 82.7 score against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, the LG G8X ThinQ is a heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit more vivid display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a little bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit greater display density. The LG G8X ThinQ has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots better photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a larger aperture and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a battery lifetime that is just as good as OPPO Find X2 Neo's battery performance, although the LG G8X ThinQ has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.