Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a global score of 81.3 against 77.7. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but LG could make it a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. OPPO Find X2 Neo and LG V35 ThinQ both have really similar displays, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better memory for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing way better quality photos and a way more MP camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 22 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.