Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a global score of 87.1 against 77.7. Although it's the best device we compare here, LG Velvet's design is just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM. LG Velvet counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same resolution back camera, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.