Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a score of 80.3 against 77.7. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Even though the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it must be noted that it is also somewhat thicker and way heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little bit better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit faster CPU than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures slightly better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.