Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Even when the OPPO Find X2 Neo and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released only 7 months apart, the OPPO Find X2 Neo is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Neo has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit higher display density. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Nubia Red Magic 3S and OPPO Find X2 Neo have similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, and although they both have a same size aperture, a same size back camera sensor and a same resolution camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.