Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a general score of 77.7, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 score. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should give you all the same OS features. OPPO Find X2 Neo's design is incredibly thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although they were only released with a couple months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a little higher screen density and a brighter screen. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better storage for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures clearer videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.