Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a score of 81.3 against 77.7. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier. These devices work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a little bigger display. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A31 features superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 24% bigger battery size. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same camera sensor size and the same resolution back facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.