Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 has a general score of 79.6, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's score of 77.7. Galaxy A40's design is lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it's just a bit thicker and was released about a year before. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A40 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.