Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's general score of 77.7. Samsung Galaxy A50's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but it is a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a just a little greater pixel amount per display inch, a little larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a back camera with lot more MP, a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A50 and OPPO Find X2 Neo count with really similar battery durations, although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a 1% lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.