Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a overall score of 85.5 against 77.7. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10. Despite being the best we are comparing, Galaxy A51 is an a little heavier and a little thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51. They have a screen of the same size, an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater pixel count in each screen inch. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a 48 megapixels camera in the back, the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo and the Galaxy A51 feature incredibly similar battery durations, although the Galaxy A51 has just 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.