Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a 90.8 score against 77.7. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, giving some extra features. Even being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G is a somewhat thicker and a little heavier phone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a display of the same size, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a 48 megapixels camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G features just a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 12% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.