Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's global score of 77.7. Even though the Galaxy A52 is newer than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it is a little thicker and a bit heavier. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52. They have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a screen with the same size. Galaxy A52 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 12% more battery size. Galaxy A52 has a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera and a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.