Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's general score of 77.7. Even though the Galaxy A52s is newer than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it is a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, so it offers a lot of extra features.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52s. They have a higher pixels count per screen inch, a same size screen and exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52s takes just a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A52s counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with just a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.