Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a general score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. The OPPO Find X2 Neo construction is newer, just a little lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy A70. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 10 OS.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a bit greater pixels number in each screen inch. The Galaxy A70 has a slightly better memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit better processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.