Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's overall score of 77.7. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 has 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features. The Galaxy A71 design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X2 Neo, but it is just a little bit heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a quite better count of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 has a bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.