Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a 92.9 score against 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.