Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having an 85.2 score against 77.7. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is an older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier phone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bigger screen and a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 6% greater battery size. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a superior camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a back camera with much more megapixels and a way larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.