Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting a 97.6 score against 77.7. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features. Although Galaxy Fold and the OPPO Find X2 Neo were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy Fold body is just a little thinner but also much heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density. The Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit better processor than OPPO Find X2 Neo. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 12 GB RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.