Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting a 90.8 score against 77.7. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 is a better device than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a bit higher screen density. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with faster video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.