Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 global score. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and heavier cellphone. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit worse display pixels density, a little smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo. They have a Octa-Core processor and 12 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.