Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a score of 81.2 against 77.7. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10. Galaxy Note 3's construction is just a bit lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it is just a little thicker and was released 7 years before.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little lower pixel density and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much bigger aperture to take better low-light captures, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a lot better resolution back camera.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.