Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's general score of 77.7. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Note 5's construction has the same weight and thickness than OPPO Find X2 Neo.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more cpu cores and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features just a bit better display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a much larger sensor and a larger diafragm aperture. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.