Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a general score of 80.4 against 77.7. Even though the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much older and a little thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's design is still just a bit lighter. OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.