Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having an 89 score against 77.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is older and a little thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's construction is still just a little lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy Note10 features a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Note10 counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the OPPO Find X2 Neo, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 15 percent greater battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in low-light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.