Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 general score. Although Galaxy S10e is older and just a bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's design is still lighter. Galaxy S10e counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit sharper display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel count per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.