Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's overall score of 77.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a thicker and notably heavier phone than OPPO Find X2 Neo.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit smaller screen and a little bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite bigger memory for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both of them have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has superior battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 24 percent greater battery size. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same size sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.