Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S5 Sport design is just a bit lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it is somewhat thicker and was released 6 years before.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a little bit better display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The OPPO Find X2 Neo takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a much larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4025mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.