Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-21 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has 5.0 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is a somewhat thicker but much lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a brighter screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Galaxy S6 Active features a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 15% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.