Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a general score of 77.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. OPPO Find X2 Neo is a newer device, and it is also notably thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has much less brightness and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater count of pixels per screen inch. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a battery life that's just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Neo one, although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.