Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 77.7. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, we must highlight that it's also an a lot older, notably thicker and heavier device. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a little more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy S8 Active features a battery performance that is very similar to the battery performance in OPPO Find X2 Neo, although the Galaxy S8 Active has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.