Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a general score of 83.3 against 77.7. Even though the Galaxy S9 is older and a little thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's design is still a little lighter. Galaxy S9 counts with a processor that's very similar to OPPO Find X2 Neo's CPU, and although the Galaxy S9 has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy S9 has a slightly better display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better pixel density. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features more storage for applications and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.