Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's score of 77.7. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, offering some additional features and performance enhancements. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an extremely heavier and way thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Neo.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.