Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 overall score. Although it's the best we compare here, it must be noted that it is also a a lot thicker and incredibly heavier phone. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, providing lots of additional features and a performance increase.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos, a lot better (4K) video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.