Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip design is a bit thinner but just a bit heavier than OPPO Find X2 Neo, and they were released only 3 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, so it provides you some additional features and performance enhancements.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower pixel density, a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Z Flip's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to OPPO Find X2 Neo's one, both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 22 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.