Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a 92.3 score against 77.7. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the OPPO Find X2 Neo were released only a couple months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is just a little bit thinner but also just a bit heavier. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, so it provides the user some additional features.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little smaller display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a bigger aperture and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Find X2 Neo count with incredibly similar memory capacity for apps and games, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 22 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.