Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a 94.6 score against 77.7. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is just a bit thinner but notably heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, and both were only released with a couple of months difference. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better processor than OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has as much storage for games and applications as the OPPO Find X2 Neo one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4025mAh. OPPO Find X2 Neo captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a worse image and video quality and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.